Co-delivery of interventions in campaigns occurs when most or all typical campaign components (microplanning, registration, logistics, implementation, and evaluation) are coordinated. Co-delivery, or full integration, allows simultaneous offer of two or more health interventions at the point of service delivery.
In a Technical Brief for the Health Campaign Effectiveness Coalition (HCE) at the Task Force for Global Health (TFGH), HCE defines co-delivery of interventions in campaigns as “occur[ring] when most or all typical campaign components (microplanning, registration, logistics, implementation, and evaluation) are coordinated. Co-delivery, or full integration, allows simultaneous offer of two or more health interventions at the point of service delivery.” This brief had two major contributors: Barkha Bhatnagar and David Gittelman. Bhatnagar is a Health Systems Research Associate at the TFGH, as well as a DrPH Candidate at Boston University School of Public Health. Gittelman (MPH) is a technical advisor for both HCE at the TFGH and for the Alliance for Malaria Prevention (AMP). The technical brief itself offers a series of “evidence-based practices and opportunities” for countries and partner organizations to improve or integrate health campaigns and outcomes. The brief performs a literature review on co-delivery and collaboration between health programs from 2002-2020 in order to discover these practices and opportunities, as well as the primary potential reasons for integration.
Health Campaign Effectiveness Coalition. “Integration Between Health Campaigns: Intervention Co-Delivery and Collaboration.” Decatur, GA: Task Force for Global Health, 2020. https://campaigneffectiveness.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Health-Campaign-Integration_Technical-Brief_14AUG2020-1.pdf.