The sharing of all or specific campaign components or functions by a specific program addressing a disease or health need with the is defined as the sharing of all or specific campaign components or functions by a specific program addressing a disease or health need with the broader health system and ongoing delivery of interventions through general health services. This approach is important because health campaigns often are implemented in silos with limited or no coordination with other public health programs in the same geographies or health domains, reducing potential efficiencies in achieving results or minimizing operational costs. Many public health professionals acknowledge the opportunities offered by integrating across health campaigns. The collection of resources below offer guidance on deciding when to integrate health campaigns and considerations for rolling out integrations.
To contribute to the learning on this topic, the HCE program office has recently deployed 12 research awards, including 8 case studies and 4 IR awards, which focus on either collaborative planning or Time-bound, intermittent activities which are deployed to address specific epidemiologic challenges, expediently fill delivery gaps, or provide surge coverage for health interventions. integration. Projects focus specifically on one of the following five health domains: malaria, neglected tropical disease, vitamin A supplementation, polio, and immunizations. Findings are expected to be shared in the fall of 2021 and 2022.
Two other resources that may be useful for public health professionals to consider are the Codelivered Campaign Tracker and the 2021 Codelivery Campaign Calendar, which shows campaigns that are currently integrating.
Technical Brief: Integration Between Health Campaigns: Intervention Co-delivery of interventions in campaigns occurs when most or all typical campaign components (microplanning, registration, logistics, implementation, and evaluation) are coordinated. Co-delivery, and Collaboration involves the sharing of specific campaign components between vertical health programs and can be thought of as collaborative delivery or partial
This technical brief published by the HCE program office is targeted toward country and regional policymakers, health campaign organizers and implementers, as well as global organizations that support health campaigns. It is intended to provide an introduction to the evidence base on two approaches of health campaign integration (Involves sharing of both operational and administrative functions and responsibilities and delivery of campaign interventions via primary health care (PHC). It occurs or “co-delivery” of campaigns and Partial integration refers to a spectrum or continuum, in which campaigns share different operational and/or administrative components with any of the PHC or “collaboration” between campaign components), summarize the An insight on how to adjust what is being done based on experience or learning (describing what was learned and by whom from past experiences, and highlight the evidence gaps. It offers additional insights on integration under the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Of particular interest may be the section titled “Which health campaigns are most appropriate for integration” as it offers WHO-suggested criteria for guiding decisions on integrated delivery of health campaigns.
The recently published Decision Guidance Toolkit for People-Centered Integration of Health Campaigns aims to assist stakeholders at country and global levels to identify and collect information on the potential opportunities for health campaign integration.
The objectives are to:
- Identify opportunities for initiating and continuing a discussion on campaign integration;
- Provide evidence-based criteria to help country health programs and stakeholders pair campaign interventions with strong promise for effective full or partial integration
- Highlight the factors that are potential facilitators and barriers to such combinations in each country context; and
- Facilitate the synthesis of global and national guidelines, standards, and criteria to inform campaign integration decisions in each country.
While not exhaustive, the two appendices–Worksheet for Global and Country Standards on Planning Health Campaign Integration and Criteria across Health Domains and Specific Interventions for Selecting Potential Campaign Integration—can be particularly helpful for the pre-planning stages of campaign integration.
(WHO) Working Together: An integration resource guide for immunization services throughout the life course
This resource guide is intended for use by national managers from immunization, reproductive, maternal child and adolescent health and other related programmes. It may also be useful for global, regional and country level policy-makers and partners responsible for the design, Implementation aims to develop strategies for available or new health interventions in order to improve access to, and the use of, these, The continuous oversight of an activity to assist in its supervision and to see that it proceeds according to plan. Monitoring involves and The systematic and objective assessment of the relevance, adequacy, progress, efficiency, effectiveness and impact of a course of actions, in relation to of integrated services, policies or health systems strengthening.
Opportunities and Barriers to Campaign Integration Across Vitamin A, Immunisation, Polio, NTDs, and Insecticide Treated Bednet Distribution: A Key Informant Interview (KII) Study in Five Countries
This qualitative research study implemented in the last quarter of 2020 sought to understand the opportunities, barriers and facilitators that the COVID-19 pandemic brought for integration in health campaigns. Faced with delayed timelines, risks of expired commodities and mitigation efforts to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission, there was a need to find efficiencies in health campaigns in order to prevent losses to public health gains made over the last decades.
Results showed that the global pandemic has opened doors for new ways of working across health campaigns, including new forms of integration. Many of the enablers mentioned by participants across the health domains were also considered to be barriers, depending on the context. Of note were the following themes: importance of coordination across the different domains to be integrated; understanding the optimum combination of commodities; considerations regarding data management for integrated campaigns; coordinated logistics and timeline of activities and; the (i) The total, direct and indirect, effects of a programme, service or institution on a health status and overall health and socio‐economic of campaign integration on human resources. Across all informants, there were also some factors that were identified as crucial to successful integration: strong leadership, supportive political will and positive personal relationships that support effective collaboration. Read more about nine of the key takeaways from the study here.
Technical Brief Public Health Campaign Integration: Lessons Learned from 30 Years of Polio Campaigns in Ethiopia, India, and Nigeria
This technical brief explores one of the longest-running health campaigns, oral polio vaccine, to draw lessons learned around how and which campaigns best integrate with one another and how campaign The ability of a campaign to achieve specific objectives related to coverage, equity, efficiency and impact. can be strengthened. Insights focused on polio campaigns’ impact on A proportion (%) that reflects the number of people receiving (an) intervention(s) divided by the total number of people eligible to receive of interventions, impact on The culture of individuals, minorities, peoples and communities, sensitive to gender and life-cycle requirements, as well as being designed to respect confidentiality of campaigns, impact on program cost and population health outcomes.
Integration of immunization services with other health interventions in the developing world: what works and why? Systematic literature review
This article published in Tropical Medicine and International Health journal explores the “benefits, challenges and characteristics of integrating child and maternal health services with immunization programmes.” After conducting a literature review, the results showed that Integrated services were vitamin A supplementation, bednet distribution, deworming tablet distribution, Intermittent Preventive Therapy for infants and referrals for family planning services. Two key characteristics of success were compatibility between interventions and presence of a strong immunization service prior to integration. Overburdened staff, unequal resource allocation and logistical difficulties were mentioned as risks of integration, whereas rapid uptake of the linked intervention and less competition for resources were listed as two key benefits of integration.
The promise of a polio-free world has been a driving force behind the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI), contributing to critical health gains over the past three decades. Indeed, before the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), polio eradication signified to many what the world could achieve by joining together to protect and promote the health of all children. The Polio Eradication Strategy 2022–2026 reflects the kind of integrated approaches that will be required to deliver on the promise of eradication. Through this new strategy, we believe the GPEI has re-envisioned its relationship with governments, deepened its commitment to polio-affected communities, made changes to empower and safeguard the frontline workforce, and expanded its partnerships to achieve broader impact in polio-priority geographies, alongside key innovations that will improve detection and response. The strategy also sets clear goals for strengthening the programme’s gender responsiveness, in recognition that progress toward eradication will be made the more that women’s meaningful participation and empowerment becomes a cornerstone of GPEI efforts, as outlined in its Gender Equality Strategy.
This eradication strategy emphasizes the need for polio campaigns to integrate with other immunization delivery and PHC services. In particular, appendix C is specific on when to integrate.